Global warming has been a serious debate throughout the past presidential election and over the past twenty years. Once the scientific community came to a “consensus” about the “data” claiming that global warming is true, they began to strike fear into the population of the world. Now, if one were to understand what global warming truly is, they must first understand the difference between global warming and climate change. Climate change is the natural process in which the climate on the planet changes due to a plethora of factors from sun spot to volcanic activity – it is and has been happening for millions of years. Global warming, on the other hand, is defined as the change in the climate due to ONLY human causes, and any sane person would look at that and know that it is false.
Now, in order to understand the basics of why global warming could easily be faked, you must look at the scientific community in itself. “Climate change scientists”, or whatever you want to call them, are paid by the government to do research on the climate and come to a consensus on whether it is warming or not. When they decide it is warming, they then publish the “data”, and after a little massaging is done, they claim it to be the unalienable truth. The actual facts are that the temperature is not changing at all, it is simply fluctuating as it always has and always will be. Some years will be colder and others warmer.
In order to claim that these scientists are producing 100% accurate statistics and facts, you must assume that they do not have or react to incentives. These scientists are paid in order to produce this data to claim that the world is warming. They are paid to incite fear into the population, to continue the cycle of doing more “research” and to receive another paycheck. Now, ask yourself this: if you were being paid in order to produce a specific set of data would you find a solution to the problem? Would you stop producing this data, or find a solution to the data that you have found, even if that meant the end of your consistently high pay? I’m sure most of you would not, because who would want to stop being paid? Even if that means delivering false facts to the people.
Republicans United 