President Obama has always refused the notion that either her or Hillary Clinton wanting to take away peoples guns even calling it a “conspiracy” in an interview with Anderson Cooper. However just hours after the killings at the Umpqua Community College in Oregon President Obama said “We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings. Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it.” President Obama called the laws they made “modest” and commonsensical.

However were they laws that they made really so “modest”? The short answer to this question is no. The laws that they made are far from modest, the Australian Government confiscated thousands of guns that its citizens owned in 1996  as part of their new gun control laws. During 1997 In Great Britain citizens were forced to turn over all of their handguns for destruction. To make it even worse the bans in Australia and Great Britain weren’t effective at all, in fact, they were counter productive causing gun crimes to sky rocket in both Australia and Great Britain. (See chart Below)

President Obama made it fairly obvious that he wants to follow in the footsteps of Australia and Great Britain and attempt to confiscate the 300 million guns owned in America. It’s obvious that President Obama and the rest of the Democrats don’t do their research before they jump to a conclusion, if they did their research then they would see that confiscating guns DOES NOT WORK.

Illegal aliens currently a large problem in America and the big question that a lot of people are asking is, are they bad for our country?  Based off the statistics it seems that they are far from good for our country and they are indeed bringing lots of crime along with them when they illegally cross into our country. For example an illegal immigrant is about 3 times more likely to commit MURDER than any given member of the general population.

Another statistic that might catch you by surprise, or not, is that almost half of of the almost 62,000 federal crimes last year were committed by the Mexico border. Of course almost all of these were tied to immigration. With about 22% of these federal crimes being related to drugs and almost 20% of them being violent crimes, it seems obvious that these illegal aliens ARE bringing crime and drugs into our country and they NEED TO BE STOPPED.

Just in case there has not been enough evidence for you, in 2014 about 3/4 of federal drug sentences were committed by illegal immigrants. Just to make it better when these drug trafficking, murderous illegal immigrants are caught, we have to pay to deport them back to where they came from meaning all in all illegal immigration costs America about $100 billion dollars annually. So it seems the best action to take against these illegal immigrants would be to just spend the money to build Trumps wall along the border of Mexico and over the long term drop crime rates and save the American tax payer a lot of money in taxes.

    We, as citizens of the developed world, are constantly barraged with the falsified facts of the mainstream media. At first glance, it may seem that these media outlets are legitimate sources of news, but when one delves deeper into them, you find that they have been taken over and controlled by the liberals of the world. Everything that is reported upon fits into some sort of agenda that they have formed. It is very clear to anyone with open eyes that every time we turn the TV on we are being lied to.

    One statistic that I love to site are the black people of this country. Now, if you are to look at how the news reports both black lives matter and the average black person of this country, you will find they are severely miss reported on. BLM, no matter what you want to believe it to be, is a terrorist organization that has been granted amnesty by both our corrupt government and liberal media. Blacks make up 13.5% of the population, according to a government conducted census last year, and yet they commit 50% of the violent crime in this country, most of it being black on black crime.

    I’m sure if any of you are to turn on any news channel, you will find a video of an “innocent” black person being shot by a “guilty” cop. This is obviously false, and an obvious claim by the media on it’s position on the matter of black people in the United States. These cops are simply acting upon the statistic that I stated before. The media is trying to brainwash us into believing that black people are always the victim of racism and always the victims in a cop on black citizen interaction. Ask yourself this: if a very small part of a population is committing the majority of crime, would you be wary around that group? Would you be cautious when one of them approaches you with an obvious intent to harm you? I know I would be more than happy to put an end to that threat right there.

   

     Global warming has been a serious debate throughout the past presidential election and over the past twenty years. Once the scientific community came to a “consensus” about the “data” claiming that global warming is true, they began to strike fear into the population of the world. Now, if one were to understand what global warming truly is, they must first understand the difference between global warming and climate change. Climate change is the natural process in which the climate on the planet changes due to a plethora of factors from sun spot to volcanic activity – it is and has been happening for millions of years. Global warming, on the other hand, is defined as the change in the climate due to ONLY human causes, and any sane person would look at that and know that it is false.

    Now, in order to understand the basics of why global warming could easily be faked, you must look at the scientific community in itself. “Climate change scientists”, or whatever you want to call them, are paid by the government to do research on the climate and come to a consensus on whether it is warming or not. When they decide it is warming, they then publish the “data”, and after a little massaging is done, they claim it to be the unalienable truth. The actual facts are that the temperature is not changing at all, it is simply fluctuating as it always has and always will be. Some years will be colder and others warmer.

    In order to claim that these scientists are producing 100% accurate statistics and facts, you must assume that they do not have or react to incentives. These scientists are paid in order to produce this data to claim that the world is warming. They are paid to incite fear into the population, to continue the cycle of doing more “research” and to receive another paycheck. Now, ask yourself this: if you were being paid in order to produce a specific set of data would you find a solution to the problem? Would you stop producing this data, or find a solution to the data that you have found, even if that meant the end of your consistently high pay? I’m sure most of you would not, because who would want to stop being paid? Even if that means delivering false facts to the people.